Главная
АИ #9 (244)
Статьи журнала АИ #9 (244)
The Evolution of Community Management in Gaming: From Forums to AI-driven Engage...

10.5281/zenodo.14968205

The Evolution of Community Management in Gaming: From Forums to AI-driven Engagement

Автор:

Рубрика

Социология

Ключевые слова

community management
gaming industry
artificial intelligence
automation
sentiment analysis
social networks
ethical challenges

Аннотация статьи

This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the evolution of community management in the gaming industry, tracing its development from early internet forums, IRC chats, and fan sites to modern AI-driven interaction systems. The study compares traditional community management methods with contemporary technologies, including GPT chatbots, voice assistants, automated sentiment analysis, and personalized interaction systems. The research methodology is based on historical-comparative analysis, case studies, digital data analysis, and expert interviews, allowing for the identification of evolutionary trends and existing research gaps in this field. Particular attention is given to ethical concerns and challenges associated with automation, such as the risk of losing the "human" element and algorithmic bias. The findings highlight the need for a hybrid model of community management, where automated systems complement the expertise of human professionals to ensure effective and empathetic engagement with the audience. By analyzing the transformation from classical forum-based communication to innovative AI-driven community management models, this study provides valuable insights for researchers in digital communication, gaming ecosystem managers, digital marketing strategists, and AI technology developers seeking to optimize user engagement and support processes in an increasingly dynamic information landscape.

Текст статьи

Introduction

With the advancement of digital technologies and the expansion of the gaming industry, the issue of effective community management has become increasingly relevant. Online communities have become an integral part of the gaming ecosystem, significantly influencing both the user experience and developers' strategic approaches. The transformation of communication methods – from early forums and IRC chats to modern platforms integrating artificial intelligence (AI) tools – has reshaped interactions between players and developers, necessitating thorough scientific analysis.

Marti C. L. et al. [1, с. 438-458] propose a conceptual model for the use of artificial intelligence in brand-oriented online communities, highlighting a significant research gap in the systematic approach to automation and personalization of service interactions. Similarly, Huang M. H. and Rust R. T. [3, с. 155-172] analyze the impact of artificial intelligence in the service industry, emphasizing the scientific novelty of identifying dynamic processes that emerge when AI is integrated into service systems. They suggest that deep AI integration not only optimizes processes but also creates new forms of user interaction by employing a mixed methodology that combines qualitative analysis with conceptual justification. Kaplan A. and Haenlein M. [4, с. 15-25] explore the interpretational aspects and implications of integrating voice assistants such as Siri, demonstrating that the technological novelty of AI raises various ethical and methodological questions that remain underexplored.

Gillespie T. [2] examines content moderation mechanisms and platform governance, drawing attention to the hidden decision-making processes shaping content in social media. The study identifies a major research gap in understanding how these decisions impact community management. Kleer N. and Kunz R. E. [5, с. 204-237] investigate the influence of community participation on the strategic business models of video game companies, emphasizing a lack of research on adapting business processes to new forms of digital interaction.

A review of existing literature reveals a clear research gap in the absence of a comprehensive study that combines a historical analysis of community management evolution in the gaming industry with an examination of contemporary AI-based interaction trends.

The objective of this study is to analyze the development of community management in the gaming industry, tracing its evolution from early forums and informal communities to modern AI-driven platforms.

The scientific novelty lies in synthesizing theoretical perspectives from previous research with an analysis of the transformational mechanisms in gaming community management. This approach enables an interpretation of the transition from traditional forums to innovative AI-based interaction models.

The research hypothesis suggests that while AI tools are highly effective in handling large data volumes and facilitating real-time moderation, they cannot fully replace human involvement. The optimal approach is a hybrid community management model, where AI systems handle routine and analytical tasks while strategic and emotionally sensitive aspects remain within the expertise of experienced professionals.

The study's methodological foundation is based on an analysis of open-access scientific publications.

1. Community management: importance in the gaming industry

Community management is a structured process of forming, developing, and maintaining communities united by shared interests, values, and passions related to a specific brand or product. In the gaming industry, this process involves organizing and coordinating interactions between players, developers, and other stakeholders, contributing not only to increased audience engagement but also to the creation of sustainable cultural spaces that facilitate knowledge exchange, experience sharing, and creative expression.

Effective community management in the gaming industry is strategically important, as active and loyal communities can:

  • Improve feedback between players and developers, enabling the prompt resolution of issues and product refinement.
  • Create additional value for the brand through user-generated content, informal opinion leaders, and organic marketing.
  • Ensure the stability and competitiveness of a game in the market by fostering long-term relationships and enhancing audience trust [1, с. 438-458].

It is essential to distinguish community management from social media management. While the latter primarily focuses on managing a brand’s presence on social platforms, promoting advertising messages, and shaping an image through mass communication, community management is centered on building personalized, two-way relationships with community members. This involves active participation in discussions, user support, event organization, and fostering self-organization within the community.

Table 1 illustrates the key differences between these two approaches.

Table 1

Comparative analysis of community management and social media management [1, с. 438-458; 4, с. 15-25]

Aspect

Community management

Social media management

Objective

Building long-term relationships, fostering a cultural space

Promoting a product/brand, mass communication

Primary focus

Interactive engagement, moderation, supporting community self-organization

Content marketing, reputation management, social media promotion

Communication type

Two-way, feedback-oriented, and empathetic interaction

One-way/mass communication, focused on information dissemination

Moderation approach

Flexible, aimed at maintaining a positive and constructive atmosphere

Standardized, based on corporate policies

Strategic focus

Social dynamics, cultural development, and audience engagement

Branding, advertising, and increasing brand recognition

Historically, community management in the gaming industry has evolved from informal, self-governed online groups to integrated support systems that combine both manual and automated interactions. In the early stages, when gaming communities were primarily based on dedicated forums and chat rooms, moderation and communication functions were carried out by enthusiasts and volunteers. Over time, as audiences grew and gaming products became more complex, the need for a more structured approach emerged. This led to the establishment of professional community manager roles, responsible for strategic planning, analytical evaluation of user feedback, and event organization.

Forums became essential components of early gaming communities. They served as spaces for discussions on gameplay, technical aspects, and future updates, while also shaping the cultural norms of player interaction. Many developers took forum activity into account when planning the further development of their games.

IRC provided a platform for real-time communication among users, facilitating rapid information exchange and the formation of tightly-knit interest-based groups. These channels were particularly popular among multiplayer online game enthusiasts.

Fan sites became the first creative platforms where users not only engaged in discussions but also produced original content, such as fan art, guides, and modifications. This contributed to the development of a unique gaming culture and strengthened the connection between developers and the community [1, с. 438-458].

The historical evolution of community management in the gaming industry demonstrates a transition from simple, informal communication platforms to highly advanced and structured interaction systems. This process has been driven not only by technological advancements but also by profound sociocultural changes, highlighting the importance of further research in this field to improve communication quality and player support in the digital age.

2. Stages of development

In the early period of online gaming, informal communication platforms such as internet forums, IRC channels, and fan sites played a key role. During this time, moderation and coordination functions were primarily carried out by enthusiasts, contributing to the formation of the first sociocultural norms and traditions within gaming communities [1, с. 438-458; 5, с. 204-237]. Multiplayer games such as EverQuest, Ultima Online, and later World of Warcraft played a particularly important role by fostering continuous information exchange between players and developers. These games required communities to self-organize to address technical and gameplay-related issues, laying the foundation for the emergence of professional community management roles.

The 2010s marked a period of rapid expansion in social media and streaming platforms, significantly transforming traditional models of interaction within gaming communities. The rise of platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and Discord enhanced communication capabilities, enabling more dynamic and immediate information exchange. At the same time, new opinion leaders emerged–streamers and content creators – whose activities on platforms like Twitch and YouTube became crucial in shaping a game’s image and its community. Games such as Destiny 2, Warframe, and No Man’s Sky illustrate how active engagement with influencers and audiences can have a substantial impact on marketing strategies and product development [1, с. 438-458]. During this period, the focus shifted from internal communication within gaming platforms to the expansion of external digital channels, which significantly broadened the audience and increased player engagement.

The modern stage of community management in the gaming industry is characterized by the active integration of advanced technologies, with artificial intelligence (AI) tools and big data analysis playing a central role. In the 2020s, AI-driven technologies such as chatbots, automated moderation systems, and personalized content algorithms became an essential part of gaming community support strategies [2]. These technologies not only enable the rapid processing of large volumes of user requests but also facilitate detailed player behavior analysis, helping to identify potential issues, including toxicity in communication. However, automation raises concerns about maintaining the "human" aspect of management, as empathy and the flexibility of traditional methods remain irreplaceable in resolving complex conflicts. Thus, modern trends represent a synthesis of technological innovation and traditional methods aimed at creating a safer and more personalized environment for player interaction.

For a clearer representation of the key characteristics of each stage of community management development, Table 2 is presented below.

Table 2

The main stages of the development of community management in the gaming industry [1, с. 438-458]

Era

Characteristics

Example platforms/games

Key technologies/methods

Main challenges

Early era (1990s – early 2000s)

Informal forums, IRC channels, fan sites; volunteer moderation

Forums, IRC; EverQuest, Ultima Online, WoW

Manual management, community self-regulation

Limited scalability; slow feedback response

Social media and streaming (2010s)

Expansion of digital communication channels; emergence of opinion leaders

Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Discord; Destiny 2, Warframe, No Man’s Sky

Social media, streaming, influencers

Decentralized management; maintaining a unified communication strategy

Modern trends (2020s)

Integration of AI, automated moderation, and personalization; big data analysis

Chatbots, AI moderation systems, personalized content

Artificial intelligence, machine learning algorithms, big data analytics

Toxicity, algorithmic bias, risk of losing the "human" factor

The evolution of community management in the gaming industry illustrates how technological advancements and sociocultural changes drive the continuous adaptation of community management strategies. The transition from manual management and volunteer moderation to the implementation of AI-driven automated systems reflects the industry's efforts to improve efficiency and responsiveness in addressing emerging challenges. However, despite technological progress, maintaining the human factor remains essential for ensuring empathetic and flexible interaction with players, which continues to be one of the key challenges of the present era.

3. Future Trends

With the advancement of digital technologies and the rapid growth of user data volumes, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are becoming a key tool in the evolution of community management. Modern solutions such as GPT chatbots and voice assistants enable scalable and efficient interaction with players, enhancing communication effectiveness.

GPT chatbots demonstrate a high capability for natural language processing, allowing them to engage in meaningful dialogues, respond to user inquiries, and even perform preliminary content moderation. These systems can adapt to individual communication styles, ensuring personalized interaction with the audience [3, с. 155-172].

Voice assistants in games are integrated into the user interface, enabling intuitive and hands-free interaction. These systems facilitate quick resolution of user queries and improve service quality, particularly in situations where standard support channels are under high demand [4, с. 15-25].

Automated sentiment analysis serves as a tool for monitoring the emotional state of a community. AI-powered systems can analyze text messages in real time, detect negative or positive trends, and signal potential outbreaks of toxicity, allowing for timely adjustments to moderation strategies [2].

Personalized interaction is based on the collection and analysis of big data regarding player behavior. Such systems enable the delivery of content, promotions, and support tailored to individual user needs, fostering higher engagement and audience loyalty [1, с. 438-458].

For a deeper analysis of the advantages and challenges of AI technologies in community management, Table 3 is presented below.

Table 3

Key AI technologies in community management: advantages and challenges [1, с. 438-458; 4, с. 15-25; 5, с. 204-237]

Technology

Advantages

Challenges/limitations

GPT Chatbots

Scalability, responsiveness, high level of personalization

Lack of empathy, limited understanding of complex context, potential for errors

Voice Assistants

Intuitive interaction, ease of use, accessibility

Speech recognition errors, limited flexibility, restricted adaptability

Automated Sentiment Analysis

Real-time monitoring, trend detection, rapid response

Algorithmic bias, false positives, need for fine-tuning

Personalized Interaction

Individualized approach, increased engagement, improved user experience

Privacy concerns, risk of data overload, complexity of system integration

Thus, despite the potential of AI in optimizing community management processes, its implementation raises several ethical and practical challenges. One of the key questions remains: can AI replace human community managers? While automated systems can efficiently handle routine tasks, they lack empathy, nuanced emotional assessment, and the ability to creatively resolve conflicts, which are critical in managing complex social interactions.

One of the primary risks of automation is the loss of the "human" factor. Excessive reliance on AI systems may lead to mechanized user interactions, negatively affecting trust and player satisfaction. Additional risks include algorithmic bias and potential errors in sentiment analysis, which could result in unfair moderation or inadequate responses to user inquiries.

The integration of AI in community management should be approached with caution, considering not only technological capabilities but also ethical concerns, ensuring a balance between process automation and maintaining high-quality, human-centered interaction.

Conclusion

An analysis of the evolution of community management in the gaming industry has been conducted, tracing its development from informal online communities on forums, IRC channels, and fan sites to modern high-tech solutions based on artificial intelligence and big data analytics. The study demonstrates that effective management of gaming communities requires not only continuous technological advancements but also the preservation of a crucial human element, ensuring empathetic and flexible engagement with users.

The transition from volunteer moderation to the integration of automated systems has significantly improved the efficiency and scalability of processes. However, it has also introduced new challenges related to algorithmic bias and the loss of emotional depth in interactions. The proposed hypothesis that a hybrid model, where automated tools complement rather than replace experienced professionals, is necessary has been confirmed through the findings of this study.

Список литературы

  1. Marti C.L. et al. Leveraging artificial intelligence in firm-generated online customer communities: a framework and future research agenda // Journal of Service Management. – 2024. – Vol. 35 (3). – P. 438-458.
  2. Gillespie T. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. – Yale University Press, 2018.
  3. Huang M.H., Rust R.T. Artificial Intelligence in Service // Journal of Service Research. – 2018. – Vol. 21 (2). – P. 155-172.
  4. Kaplan A., Haenlein M. Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence // Business Horizons. – 2019. – Vol. 62 (1). – P. 15-25.
  5. Kleer N., Kunz R.E. The Impact of Actor Engagement on the Business Models of Video Game Developers // International Journal on Media Management. – 2021. – Vol. 23 (3-4). – P. 204-237.

Поделиться

93

Pyslar M.. The Evolution of Community Management in Gaming: From Forums to AI-driven Engagement // Актуальные исследования. 2025. №9 (244). Ч.I. С. 69-73. URL: https://apni.ru/article/11436-the-evolution-of-community-management-in-games-from-forums-to-ai-driven-interaction

Обнаружили грубую ошибку (плагиат, фальсифицированные данные или иные нарушения научно-издательской этики)? Напишите письмо в редакцию журнала: info@apni.ru

Похожие статьи

Актуальные исследования

#10 (245)

Прием материалов

8 марта - 14 марта

осталось 3 дня

Размещение PDF-версии журнала

19 марта

Размещение электронной версии статьи

сразу после оплаты

Рассылка печатных экземпляров

2 апреля